Copyable TPM Workplace Toolkit
These templates are prompts, not proof. Delete fields that do not help a decision, add fields required by your domain, and follow your organization's authorized systems for confidential, security, privacy, financial, or regulated information.
Everyday TPM cockpit
Use this as a brief daily scan and weekly reset. Do not duplicate an authoritative system. Link to it and capture only the integration signal you need.
Program outcome and current confidence:
What materially changed since the last review:
Top three cross-team dependencies and next evidence:
Decisions due in the next seven days:
Open actions that now threaten an outcome or milestone:
New or changed risks, assumptions, issues, or constraints:
Capacity or priority negotiation needed:
Stakeholder conversation or 1:1 needed:
Written update or escalation needed:
Launch / operational-readiness delta:
What I should stop, delegate, or remove:
Next review date and owner of this cockpit:Stakeholder 1:1 pre-wire card
Stakeholder / role:
Their likely goal, incentive, or constraint:
What I need to learn:
Decision or commitment that may be coming:
Evidence / options to share:
Likely objection or dissent to invite:
Authority boundary: what neither of us can decide alone:
My opening question:
Follow-up, owner, and date:
What must enter the shared program record:Capacity and priority trade-off card
Outcome at risk:
Requested capacity or priority change:
Current constraint and evidence:
Option A: scope / date / staffing / risk consequence:
Option B: scope / date / staffing / risk consequence:
Option C: scope / date / staffing / risk consequence:
Team owner who can make the commitment:
Business or product owner who can accept the trade-off:
Decision needed by:
What happens if no decision is made:Program takeover or handoff card
Outcome, benefit owner, and current confidence:
Local charter and decision-rights link:
System context and critical interfaces:
Integrated roadmap and current critical path:
Top risks, issues, assumptions, and expiring exceptions:
Open decisions with deadlines and deciders:
Commitments due in the next 30 days:
Launch / operational-readiness state:
Stakeholder map, working agreements, and sensitive history:
Authoritative records and communication channels:
Known unknowns and how to investigate them:
First review to run and why:
Outgoing owner / incoming owner / acceptance date:1. Local TPM charter
Program / TPM:
Outcome I integrate:
In scope:
Explicitly out of scope:
Decisions I own:
Decisions I make ready but do not own:
Delegated authority and limits:
Required domain owners / concurrence:
Escalation path and delegates:
Success evidence:
Review date:2. Strategy-to-benefit trace
Strategic choice:
Investment thesis:
Program outcome:
Capabilities / outputs:
Adoption and operating changes:
Benefit owner(s):
Leading evidence:
Confirmation measures / horizon:
Counter-metrics / possible harm:
Critical assumptions:
Invalidating signals:
Continue / reshape / pause / stop review:3. System-context and critical-trace card
Customer / actor goal:
Entry point:
Systems and owners crossed:
Interfaces / protocols:
State written or read:
Trust and authority boundaries:
Quality attributes that matter:
Failure propagation path:
Telemetry / evidence available:
Unknowns and evidence owner:4. Requirements, constraints, and assumptions register
ID / statement:
Type: need | requirement | quality attribute | constraint | assumption
Source / owner:
Rationale:
Verification method:
Decision affected:
Change authority:
Status / expiry:5. Alternatives and trade-off record
Decision / deadline / decider:
Must-have constraints:
Option A / B / C:
Evidence for each:
Reliability / security / privacy / cost / time consequences:
Reversibility and switching cost:
Unknowns / fastest safe test:
Rejected rationale:
Recommendation / confidence:
Conditions that would change it:6. Interface and dependency record
Dependency / interface:
Provider owner / consumer owner:
Needed capability and evidence:
Needed-by / confidence:
Current state:
Trigger that threatens the path:
Mitigation / contingency:
Decision or escalation required:
Integration test / acceptance owner:7. RAID-plus record
Type: risk | assumption | issue | action | decision | change
Specific condition:
Consequence / exposure:
Trigger / observed evidence:
Owner:
Mitigation / action:
Contingency / rollback:
Due date / decision-by:
Residual risk accepter:
Verification / closure evidence:8. Decision log
Decision / ID:
Date / decision owner:
Context and deadline:
Options considered:
Evidence and dissent:
Decision and rationale:
Conditions / expiry:
Consequences and actions:
Audience notified:
Revisit trigger:9. Executive update
Outcome and current confidence:
What materially changed:
Demonstrated state vs inference:
Top exposure and trigger:
Decision / help required, owner, deadline:
Options and recommendation:
Next integration proof:
Customer / business consequence:
Residual risk:10. Launch and operational-readiness case
Launch scope / versions / regions:
Authorized launch owner:
Technical evidence:
Reliability / capacity evidence:
Security / privacy / compliance gates:
Data migration / reconciliation evidence:
Monitoring / alerting / ownership:
Support / training / communications:
Incident command / escalation:
Rollback / restore / kill-path exercise:
Go / limited go / hold criteria:
Residual exposure and acceptance:
Post-launch observation window:11. Operating mechanism card
Repeated condition / evidence:
Trigger:
Inputs / sources / freshness / owners:
Participants and why needed:
Decision owner / available decisions:
Recorded output / communication:
Leading and lagging effectiveness signals:
Coordination load:
Gaming or failure modes:
Pilot / baseline:
Adapt / retire review date:12. Program recovery control page
Protected outcome / non-negotiables:
Observed facts (timestamp / source):
Inferences:
Commitments:
Unknowns:
Current exposure / containment:
Options and consequences:
Recommendation / confidence:
Decisions due / authorized owners:
Evidence-producing milestones:
Coverage / escalation / communication:
Recovery exit criteria:
Prevention mechanism owner:13. AI-program evaluation and oversight card
Use case / prohibited use:
People affected / consequence level:
Data sources / consent / provenance:
Model / prompt / retrieval / tool versions:
Representative tasks and high-risk slices:
Baseline and acceptance ranges:
Groundedness / task success / harm measures:
Security and prompt-injection tests:
Tool permissions / approval boundaries:
Human escalation and appeal:
Monitoring / drift / incidents:
Disable / rollback / kill path:
Release owner / domain gates:
Known limitations / next review:14. Capstone decision one-pager
Decision required / owner / deadline:
Outcome and benefit thesis:
Demonstrated current state:
Material unknowns and confidence:
Top technical/system exposure:
Top execution/human-system exposure:
Options and consequences:
Recommendation and why now:
Required domain gates:
Residual risks / authorized acceptance:
Immediate next evidence:
Launch / hold / rollback conditions:
Outcome, harm, and benefit review: